Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
 Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 21:46 |
 
|
First off:
Rat Ogre is far better than an Ogre.
Second:
Make a catcher 0-2 7/3/3/8, catch, dodge. Leave prices as is. Now you've got your team.
Third:
Why would you possibly want to play humans? (Unless you're in Omerta! Omerta rules!) Humans are BORING. Yes you Buccaneers, my Ungors of Krul want to play against you! |
|
|
johnnih
Joined: Feb 26, 2012
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 21:57 |
|
| PainState wrote: | | spubbbba wrote: | | [Humans are mediocre at best at low TV, but just plain suck above 1750, I'd say only khemri are worse of the tier 1 teams. |
Ok thats it...this is the last straw..You guys have forced me to do the unthinkable.
Iam going to prove all you guys wrong. Iam going to win the GLT with the Buccaneers. Buff my team with a dark elf renegade or a dwarf long beard or a goblin. |
Yay! I'm cheering for you.
I am looking into handling money over the net by the way. Your fluff buccaneer thread inspired me, so I might make a bit.
| Nelphine wrote: | First off:
Rat Ogre is far better than an Ogre. |
Whaat? I think the ogre is superior. And that is not by a little. Wild animal is jsut about the worst nega-trait, bone-head is the best!
| Nelphine wrote: |
Second:
Make a catcher 0-2 7/3/3/8, catch, dodge. Leave prices as is. Now you've got your team.
|
I don't like the ST3 at all.. it is cool that they are so fast. 0-4 8/2/3/8 catch dodge for me.
| Nelphine wrote: |
Third:
Why would you possibly want to play humans? (Unless you're in Omerta! Omerta rules!) Humans are BORING. Yes you Buccaneers, my Ungors of Krul want to play against you! |
No love for human  I like them |
|
|
Shraaaag
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Location: Trondheim, Norway
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 21:58 |
|
Is there any statistics which shows humans doing worse than intended? |
_________________
 |
|
johnnih
Joined: Feb 26, 2012
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 22:01 |
|
Again, plasmoids site had a lot of statistics on win ratios etc. But it's down atm.
Depends on what was intened. I just think they were intended to be tier 1 and they are.
During BBRC times tier 1 was intended to be 45-55 % winrate, and they made that as far as I know. But that is a huge interval too. It is everything from dwarves and wood elves to pro elves and (probably) khemri. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 22:15 |
|
Meh the bbrc are full of poo, that win percentage bracket is so wide and vague its meamingless. Humans are great fun to play with imo and that is all important and the reason I said they are fine. In fact I think I will start playing with them again, humans are cool 
However from a fluff perspective they should be a lot better really. They should be reaching major finals often winning leagues etc and they aren't. The av or st buff to the catcher still wouldn't make this much more likely imo. But two blockers would, they wouldn't even need st4. Just 2 extra st players in the team would be huge. However this may make them less fun, individual, and cool. It's a tricky one really. |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Location: in a treee
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 22:27 |
|
| Reisender wrote: | | pythrr wrote: | | Garion wrote: | | Humans are fine, try playing some games with them first. . |
Or even any games at all. |
you guys played tons of games and and you are still wrong |
Err. No. |
_________________
https://fumbbl.com/i/366915
***************************
Avatar-image courtesy of JarvisPants-guy. Blame him. He made me do it. |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Location: in a treee
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 22:29 |
|
| Nelphine wrote: | First off:
Rat Ogre is far better than an Ogre.
|
Nonsense. RO is an unreliable injury-prone liability. |
_________________
https://fumbbl.com/i/366915
***************************
Avatar-image courtesy of JarvisPants-guy. Blame him. He made me do it. |
|
Beerox
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 22:38 |
|
| Shraaaag wrote: | | The only thing the humans need, is a halfling to toss for OTTD like the goblin on the orc team ;P |
That would be sweet. |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 23:17 |
|
Ogres are boring. Ergo, Rat Ogres are better. (Though not as good as Minotaurs; best big guy in the game!) |
|
|
Purplegoo
Joined: Mar 23, 2006
Location: Cambridge, England
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 23:17 |
|
All mens Clawpomb. |
_________________
British or British based? Check out the White Isle League! |
|
CavSgtBob
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 23:34 |
|
| Garion wrote: | Meh the bbrc are full of poo, that win percentage bracket is so wide and vague its meamingless. Humans are great fun to play with imo and that is all important and the reason I said they are fine. In fact I think I will start playing with them again, humans are cool
However from a fluff perspective they should be a lot better really. They should be reaching major finals often winning leagues etc and they aren't. The av or st buff to the catcher still wouldn't make this much more likely imo. But two blockers would, they wouldn't even need st4. Just 2 extra st players in the team would be huge. However this may make them less fun, individual, and cool. It's a tricky one really. |
I actually think that a small buff to catchers WOULD make a big difference in the overall functionality of the team. An 0-4 positional should be more integral to a team than human catchers currently are. That said, +1 for Garion's defense of humans in general. |
|
|
polardragon
Joined: May 07, 2011
|
| Posted:
Apr 26, 2012 - 23:40 |
|
Time to try coaching the humans. |
_________________
  |
|
Niebling
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 27, 2012 - 00:03 |
|
| johnnih wrote: | Again, plasmoids site had a lot of statistics on win ratios etc. But it's down atm.
. |
It Will be back up soon, he just reached his bandwith limt for this month. Seems he had a bit more trafic Than normal |
_________________
Someone is wrong on the Internet and it is my sworn duty to correct them. |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Location: in a treee
|
| Posted:
Apr 27, 2012 - 00:06 |
|
| CavSgtBob wrote: | | Garion wrote: | Meh the bbrc are full of poo, that win percentage bracket is so wide and vague its meamingless. Humans are great fun to play with imo and that is all important and the reason I said they are fine. In fact I think I will start playing with them again, humans are cool
However from a fluff perspective they should be a lot better really. They should be reaching major finals often winning leagues etc and they aren't. The av or st buff to the catcher still wouldn't make this much more likely imo. But two blockers would, they wouldn't even need st4. Just 2 extra st players in the team would be huge. However this may make them less fun, individual, and cool. It's a tricky one really. |
I actually think that a small buff to catchers WOULD make a big difference in the overall functionality of the team. An 0-4 positional should be more integral to a team than human catchers currently are. That said, +1 for Garion's defense of humans in general. |
Believe all you want.
It ain't gonna happen. |
_________________
https://fumbbl.com/i/366915
***************************
Avatar-image courtesy of JarvisPants-guy. Blame him. He made me do it. |
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
6 3 3 8 linos for 40k! That's crazy and isn't going to happen. 6 3 3 8 linos at 50k is the game standard and everything else is modified from it (no examples where this isn't the case please, it doesn't help).
Also although the catcher av buff is quite simple, it doesn't fit fluffwise and I don't think it's that much of a buff. It's not hard to make catchers blodgers, so they shouldn't be going down 'that' much anyway, making the buff quite minimal.
Personally I think they should stay how they are. If they were to be buffed I'd opt for 80k blitzers, everyone buys 4 of these anyway, so it doesn't alter the team compilation at all, and just means they bite a bit bettter at their TV. |
|
|
|
|
You get 1,000,000 an...
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
