Synn
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Location: Here but far gone in a metaphysical way....
|
 Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 18:52 |
 
|
Pretty simple really....
Should there be a limit on inducements in tourney matches?
__Synn |
|
|
opusthefowl
Joined: May 28, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 18:53 |
|
|
Smeesh
Joined: Oct 29, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 18:57 |
|
not really needed.
The only thing that sucks a bit are extreme low TV teams in the mayors. There should be some minimum. 1200 TV is enough.
Greetings
Smeesh |
|
|
jarvis_pants
Joined: Oct 30, 2008
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 18:59 |
|
|
liquidorange
Joined: Feb 08, 2005
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 19:01 |
|
I think there should be a minimum hard cap on TV for majors teams. I don't want to watch teams at 1300 TV playing one another. I want to see two developed teams, each around 2000 TV or so, duking it out in a huge slugfest.
This might resolve some of the inducements issues, because everyone would be at a minimum level - and wind up probably somewhere between 2000 and 2400 TV. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 19:04 |
|
I can't remember the page but I'm pretty sure crp says somewhere that wizards and star.players shouldn't be used in finals. I think it might be the house rule section mind. And to op no I don't think so really. |
_________________
Unnerf Master Chef for Flings 2013!!! |
|
Calcium
Joined: Apr 08, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 19:08 |
|
No |
_________________
What everyone who whines about CPOMB really means -
WAAHHHHHH....MY PIXELS ALL DIE.....WAAHHHHHHHH....
I PLAY BLOOD BOWL BUT HATE THE BLOOD.....WAAHHHHHHHH |
|
Hitonagashi
Joined: Apr 09, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 19:27 |
|
|
Purplegoo
Joined: Mar 23, 2006
Location: Cambridge, England
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 19:46 |
|
I don't understand why, unless you thought the old system of smashing people with less time than yourself with a pimped team was best? Tournaments work with inducements. I'd be happy to only play within 5 in normal games, mind. |
_________________
Waterbowl FTW.
British or British based? Check out the White Isle League! |
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
Plus side: May encourage coaches to make the best team they can, not stay within a niche.
Minus point: Coaches may not bother prepping for or doing tourneys, as it's harder work/less potential reward. |
|
|
uuni
Joined: Mar 12, 2010
Location: Finland
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 20:27 |
|
Me too: No caps.
Inducements should not be as good as players. If inducement is better than your players, you have not built it efficiently. |
|
|
RedFish
Joined: Dec 04, 2004
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 20:38 |
|
| uuni wrote: | Me too: No caps.
Inducements should not be as good as players. If inducement is better than your players, you have not built it efficiently. |
Or you're playing Halflings  |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 20:39 |
|
|
blader4411
Joined: Oct 18, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 20:57 |
|
No.
LRB6 Majors = One of the best things about this edition.
A hard cap would be reverting to a part of LRB4 that few people miss.
-Blader |
|
|
Tricktickler
Joined: Jul 10, 2004
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted:
Jan 25, 2012 - 21:00 |
|
No, just double the cost of wizard. |
_________________
clawpomb beats skill |
|
|
|
NBFL Season 10
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
