Posted by WoodPusher on 2014-07-09 04:24:39

Batman would think so.

Posted by JackassRampant on 2014-07-09 04:39:07

Depends on the opposition and the clock, but sounds good to me.

Posted by fidius on 2014-07-09 06:07:51

I'd answer your question, but it would just be my opinion, and I have no data to back it up, so what's the point?

Posted by cdassak on 2014-07-09 06:38:47

Perhaps...

Posted by the_Sage on 2014-07-09 08:23:38

If you're Brazilian, it seems sensible.

In blood bowl: sometimes.

It really depends a lot on tons of factors. The races involved, the player count and damage potential, remaining wizards, who gets to receive later on, who has decent OTTD options, whether the game will go to overtime if tied, etc., etc. Opponents' teams like skaven and wood elves often make 2-0 while they still have some players, but dwindle throughout a game, allowing a comeback.

I've given up games while still 0-0 or even felt hopeless while 1-0 ahead. I've also had games where I felt I had a good fighting chance when the 2-0 hit.

Example where it didn't hold:
0-2 behind after my receiving half. Ended 3-2 for me.
https://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=match&id=3432535

Posted by pythrr on 2014-07-09 09:48:27

Neymar joke people, Neymar joke... lol

Posted by gamelsetlmatch on 2014-07-09 17:50:18

It would be the third goal (vertebrae) that was the back breaker. =P

Posted by the_Sage on 2014-07-10 17:18:41

hehe, thanks pythrr. I did miss that the first time. =D