dabassman
Joined: Feb 17, 2006
|
  Posted:
Sep 02, 2022 - 14:41 |
|
sebco wrote: |
The question seemed to be "is there a mandatory order to bribe / argue the call" and order is 1- Argue the Call
2- Bribe while coaches said it was 1- Bribe and 2- Argue the Call in the client (maybe it's no more the case now, I have to admit I didn't check). |
Unfortunately, it is still the case.
And I'd like to add, IF you had the possibility to chose the order, no one would Argue the Call first, because you risk to roll a "1" and then the sequence ends (no bribe allowed, head coach and player ejected).
Whereas, if you could bribe first, after a "1" you would still be able to Argue. |
|
|
Jokaero
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 02, 2022 - 15:59 |
|
double post -> deleted |
Last edited by Jokaero on %b %02, %2022 - %16:%Sep; edited 1 time in total |
|
Jokaero
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 02, 2022 - 16:05 |
|
double post -> deleted |
Last edited by Jokaero on %b %02, %2022 - %16:%Sep; edited 1 time in total |
|
Jokaero
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 02, 2022 - 16:10 |
|
dabassman wrote: |
And I'd like to add, IF you had the possibility to chose the order, no one would Argue the Call first, because you risk to roll a "1" and then the sequence ends (no bribe allowed, head coach and player ejected).
Whereas, if you could bribe first, after a "1" you would still be able to Argue. |
I don't think so. As you yourself indicated before, Coaches who bought a Biased Referee, would always wanna AtC first. And if your team possesses the Bribery and Corruption Special Rule, and you haven't used the reroll when rolling a '1' yet, you might also prefer to roll AtC first to save the Bribe.
As for the intended order. I'm sure that 'Atc then Bribe' is correct as some parts of the rule clearly indicate it. Whether 'Bribe then AtC' can be optionally applied, remains unclear for the moment. I don't find anything that forbids it, so I can understand that developers hesitate to turn it around as long as it's not clearly ruled out. |
|
|
Java
Joined: Jan 27, 2018
|
  Posted:
Sep 02, 2022 - 20:48 |
|
I've sent an email to the usual address, fingers crossed |
_________________ Vlad Von Carstein's door-to-door evangelist |
|
Jokaero
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 03, 2022 - 13:23 |
|
thanks, let's hope it will be looked at. |
|
|
Lyracian
Joined: Oct 29, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 05, 2022 - 16:54 |
|
Java wrote: | I've sent an email to the usual address, fingers crossed |
I sent it in last time but perhaps continued harassment will work… |
_________________ Nuffle wills it.
Lyracian. |
|
Java
Joined: Jan 27, 2018
|
  Posted:
Sep 05, 2022 - 22:11 |
|
Sending the same question in various formulations from different sources is a better chance to make them feel like an answer is needed, so maybe send again what you sent last year? Probably wouldn't hurt XD |
_________________ Vlad Von Carstein's door-to-door evangelist |
|
Lyracian
Joined: Oct 29, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 08, 2022 - 19:51 |
|
Java wrote: | Sending the same question in various formulations from different sources is a better chance to make them feel like an answer is needed, so maybe send again what you sent last year? Probably wouldn't hurt XD |
I have sent it in from a different email address. Lets see if the weight of numbers makes a difference. |
_________________ Nuffle wills it.
Lyracian. |
|
Java
Joined: Jan 27, 2018
|
  Posted:
Sep 08, 2022 - 20:14 |
|
I could send it from my work email |
_________________ Vlad Von Carstein's door-to-door evangelist |
|
sebco
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
|
  Posted:
Sep 08, 2022 - 22:38 |
|
Hey, be soft, we have other questions waiting for an answer! |
_________________ I like cheese but don't call me skaven ! |
|
|