MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
 Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 13:48 |
 
|
I think it would be better to have the hidden coaches listed by alphabetical order.
Thanks for attention. |
|
|
Xandyreoch
Joined: Jun 21, 2020
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:10 |
|
getting enough to need it? 
i've only hidden one guy so far, but i can see it might be _nice_ to have them sorted like on friends list, but doesn't really affect much, i mean.... they ARE hidden after all  |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:14 |
|
I just suggest what is logical. If there is a nickname list, logic suggests that there must be an alphabetical order.
You could hide by accident somebody (or want to unhide somebody) and an alphabetical order would help to spot him quicker. |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:19 |
|
given his rules, in a ruleset that specifically wants people to spend treasury for inducements, i would expect his list to be very large |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:24 |
|
The ruleset specifically wants Season Re-Draft too and it has not been implemented yet. With Season Re-Draft spending Treasury for Inducements would be less likely, I guess.
We must consider the overall picture. |
|
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:26 |
|
Also its not picking if opponent agrees to play |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:28 |
|
Only if we assume that both coaches are not clueless about Blood Bowl, match-up and different races' performance.
If you challenge a guy unable to assess the fairness of a match it's still picking. |
|
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:34 |
|
Ah, it was just something that I have heard a legendary coach have said about his games |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 14:36 |
|
I never said it, if you are talking about me. I only want the Box, where there is no picking.
A Box where people don't play only TV 1000 or lower teams, if possible. It's super boring. |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 15:51 |
|
if it's picking if you challenge against someone unable to assess the quality of the match, how is that any different than if you play against someone unable to assess the quality of their team (even if they are in the box)? |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 15:51 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | The ruleset specifically wants Season Re-Draft too and it has not been implemented yet. With Season Re-Draft spending Treasury for Inducements would be less likely, I guess.
We must consider the overall picture. |
nah, i would spend treasury at least 2/3 of the games, even with redrafts. |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 16:05 |
|
| Nelphine wrote: | | if it's picking if you challenge against someone unable to assess the quality of the match, how is that any different than if you play against someone unable to assess the quality of their team (even if they are in the box)? |
In the Box I can play vs something unable or able to assess matches, in GF I can do it 100%.
Therefore Box is a better system than GF.
It's crystal clear.
Not perfect, but way better than allowing to pick opponent and race. |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 16:06 |
|
but in GF you could play 100% against people able to assess the match. why not do that? |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 16:07 |
|
| Nelphine wrote: | | MattDakka wrote: | The ruleset specifically wants Season Re-Draft too and it has not been implemented yet. With Season Re-Draft spending Treasury for Inducements would be less likely, I guess.
We must consider the overall picture. |
nah, i would spend treasury at least 2/3 of the games, even with redrafts. |
Ok, but for sure fewer times than without Re-Draft, right? |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Aug 23, 2022 - 16:09 |
|
| Nelphine wrote: | | but in GF you could play 100% against people able to assess the match. why not do that? |
Because the people I'd like to play against turn down my offers, simple!!! |
|
|
|
|
Conceding v Goblins/...
Search
