neoliminal
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Feb 18, 2013 - 19:19 |
 
|
| Purplegoo wrote: | Cool list.
Do we draw any conclusions from it at all? |
Yes. Spiraling Expenses need to have higher levels |
_________________
*
<BBRC>retired</BBRC><NAF>founder, 1st, 2nd Presidents</NAF><BB-Developers>retired</BB-Developers><Game-Developer>active</Game-Developer> |
|
gjopie
Joined: Oct 27, 2009
|
| Posted:
Feb 18, 2013 - 19:32 |
|
| Calcium wrote: | I humbly submit my loaded chaos team.....was 1.4M at one point but I went inducement mad  |
830k? That's small change for a chaos team! |
_________________
  |
|
Scaramanga
Joined: May 01, 2012
|
| Posted:
Feb 18, 2013 - 19:35 |
|
| neoliminal wrote: | | Purplegoo wrote: | Cool list.
Do we draw any conclusions from it at all? |
Yes. Spiraling Expenses need to have higher levels |
Spiraling expenses need to be removed. |
|
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 18, 2013 - 19:40 |
|
| neoliminal wrote: | | Purplegoo wrote: | Cool list.
Do we draw any conclusions from it at all? |
Yes. Spiraling Expenses need to have higher levels |
I believe he was being ironic. SE needs some 'tweaking' but if you look at most of the teams, it isn't an SE thing. It's a abusing the system and polluting the environment thing. |
|
|
Calcium
Joined: Apr 08, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 18, 2013 - 19:43 |
|
| gjopie wrote: | | Calcium wrote: | | I humbly submit my loaded chaos team.....was 1.4M at one point but I went inducement mad |
830k? That's small change for a chaos team! |
Yeah, all that cash burns a hole in my pocket |
_________________
 |
|
gjopie
Joined: Oct 27, 2009
|
| Posted:
Apr 12, 2013 - 14:06 |
|
| gjopie wrote: | Updated the Rich List again.
Not so much movement this time, with only three new teams entering and only two races being particularly upwardly mobile (Amazons and Humans). Not such a big increase in amounts of gold either, and in many cases there has been a decrease. Could this be the beginning of the end for money hoarding?
(Probably not) |
It's the Second Anniversary of the FUMBBL Rich List!
The Necromantics still look unassailable at the top of the list, and Ogres languish at the bottom. Elsewhere, Pro Elves overtook their Wood Elf cousins, Dwarves overtook Lizards, and both Humans and Amazons were big losers (although this was probably just a reaction to their climb last update). |
_________________
|
|
gjopie
Joined: Oct 27, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 11, 2013 - 17:34 |
|
I think it might be time for another update to the Unofficial FUMBBL Rich List! With the shock retirement of the previous number 1 spot, the list has been shaken up, and the average wealth has dropped by over 200,000! We have a new number 1, and 5 new entries. |
_________________
|
|
Cavetroll
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 11, 2013 - 18:20 |
|
Not that I am intentionally trying to get on the list, but I might as well get credit for stumbling into it. My Charnelhouse_Dune have 690K saved up which should be good enough to bump those Ogres off.
Update: Doh, I can't read. The list is ranked by race, not by money. I'm nowhere close to the top of the Undead list. Stupid Ogres. |
_________________
nerf indigo 2016 |
|
gjopie
Joined: Oct 27, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 10:35 |
|
Don't worry - you're certainly not the first to make that classic mistake, and I doubt you'll be the last either! |
_________________
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 10:42 |
|
| harvestmouse wrote: | | neoliminal wrote: | | Purplegoo wrote: | Cool list.
Do we draw any conclusions from it at all? |
Yes. Spiraling Expenses need to have higher levels |
I believe he was being ironic. SE needs some 'tweaking' but if you look at most of the teams, it isn't an SE thing. It's a abusing the system and polluting the environment thing. |
in that case, should official action not be, err, cough, taken? |
_________________
 |
|
gjopie
Joined: Oct 27, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 11:05 |
|
Actually, if you look at the current list, there is very little journeyman "abuse". It was certainly true of the original, but not really true any more, in my opinion. |
_________________
|
|
uzkulak
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 11:14 |
|
Interesting that qvite a lot of these teams dont seem to be vsing the fvll range of positionals. Seems that the best way to hoard money is to field a gimped team.
Or be a minmaxer. |
|
|
King_Ghidra
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 11:15 |
|
| pythrr wrote: |
in that case, should official action not be, err, cough, taken? |
Overreaction somewhat.
I find the minmax low tv teams distasteful, but I don't see any rule-breaking here and this issue has been discussed to death in more appropriate threads anyway. Many of the teams here are just natural products of playing a good amount of games in an environment that encourages tv sweet-spotting and doesn't lead to them needing replacements. That's the way CRP and blackbox rolls. If it's so objectionable, change blackbox - it's responsible for almost every meta-gaming issue brought up on the forums. |
|
|
Muktar
Joined: Dec 02, 2012
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 11:49 |
|
tv sweetspotting in the blackbox would be less of an issue if you can ban yourself from playing against certain players/teams. Oh... And actually follow blood bowl rules and not a bastardization that supports what the black box is now. I'm talking about concessions. |
|
|
PaddyMick
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
|
| Posted:
Jul 12, 2013 - 11:53 |
|
| Muktar wrote: | | tv sweetspotting in the blackbox would be less of an issue if you can ban yourself from playing against certain players/teams. Oh... And actually follow blood bowl rules and not a bastardization that supports what the black box is now. I'm talking about concessions. |
That's interesting. Main reason I don't play box so much is that I find ranked have friendlier coaches. Most of my blacklist comes from box.
How would you change concessions? |
|
|
|
|
NBFL Season 32: The ...
Search
