JoeKano
Joined: Aug 30, 2003
|
 Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:34 |
 
|
Deleted narky tiredness induced comment. ok yes i quoted you out of context then. Ill accept that, it wasnt my intent but i concede you the point. I apoligise. It is 330 in the morning and i have been going since 7:30 this morning after running day two of a tournament. SO im not being as bright and sparky. |
_________________
"Take the Strength, crush the opposing linemen, drive them broken before you and hear the lamentation of their Cheerleaders!!!"
 |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:39 |
|
Glad you've conceded the point. Yes, it does get tiring with long days. 
My point was about the nature of committees in general: not merely the ones i sit on in an institutional role or BBRC. Committees justify their existience - it's just what they do - and a rules committee, by it's very nominal construction, changes rules. If there are no more changes required, why should such a committee continue to exist?
However, if the BBRC has other duties, then fine. But what are these, aside from considering rules? |
_________________
 |
|
JoeKano
Joined: Aug 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:42 |
|
Mostly they do the stuff that earns them money.
Babs is a writer trying to get published, i think thats also his off time job not his real, Galak is basically Impact Miniatures, they are the ones I know. The others i dont so cant help you there. |
_________________
"Take the Strength, crush the opposing linemen, drive them broken before you and hear the lamentation of their Cheerleaders!!!"
|
|
JoeKano
Joined: Aug 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:43 |
|
Oh Doubleskulls has a real world job too, and hes also a tournament organiser, EucBowl one of the biggest Aus tournaments. Ok yes theres 2 aussies at least on the commitee your point being?? Everyone knows Aussies are the worlds real blood bowlers.. |
_________________
"Take the Strength, crush the opposing linemen, drive them broken before you and hear the lamentation of their Cheerleaders!!!"
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:45 |
|
Hehe, I meant other BB-committee duties, but thanks for the insights.
Hope the tourny was fun. |
_________________
|
|
JoeKano
Joined: Aug 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:46 |
|
I think i better go sleep now i'm watcdhing charmed on late night tele howd that happen. |
_________________
"Take the Strength, crush the opposing linemen, drive them broken before you and hear the lamentation of their Cheerleaders!!!"
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 17:51 |
|
LOL. Watching "Charmed" is a clear sign of madness. |
_________________
|
|
Mr_Foulscumm
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2009 - 18:17 |
|
Trolls... give it a break. Seriously. |
_________________
Everybody's favorite coach on FUMBBL |
|
Babs
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 09:26 |
|
Pythyrr - I do think you were off topic with this thread. It was a discussion on whether or not the client should be migrating straight to LRB 6 rather than LRB 5.
It was not a philosophical argument about whether the BBRC have the right to exist. These are rather different topics.
..and Kalamar - you are completely correct in that LRB 6 will be stat changes and minor rule tweaks in comparison. However, it appears that there's a 'split' in the community with deaf producing a client that is FUMBBL independant. Should I be making the same offer to him over on 'that other website'? |
_________________
=-) Babs
BBRC member
NAF Tournament Organiser - Pacific region
New to FUMBBL!
Have you signed up for the Feudball Novel yet? |
|
Kalimar
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 09:47 |
|
@Babs: your choice ... how should I decide what kind of offers you make to whom ?
My client will most likely support LRB6 on top of LRB5 when it comes out. Would love to support LRB4 as well but that's actually a lot more work than going forward. |
|
|
veron
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 09:48 |
|
Okay, everyone please stay on the topic. If you want to discuss how DP should work or who should decide the future rules of the game, please do that in the right forum. This is not it.
Be nice and behave. If you have nothing constructive to say to the subject in hand, think twice if you should post at all. |
|
|
Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 10:01 |
|
Deaf was making his client for a French group, it was never intended for FUMBBL. The "split" is that not EVERYONE plays online bloodbowl at fumbbl.com ...
| Babs wrote: |
..and Kalamar - you are completely correct in that LRB 6 will be stat changes and minor rule tweaks in comparison. However, it appears that there's a 'split' in the community with deaf producing a client that is FUMBBL independant. Should I be making the same offer to him over on 'that other website'? |
|
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
SneakyFox
Joined: Oct 29, 2005
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 10:20 |
|
As far as I am aware LRB6 fixes the things that were forgotten from LRB5. It's not a completely new system, rather a patch. As such, it should already be included on Kalimar's client when it goes past Beta test. At least, that's how I'd want it and as Kalimar stated, the changes are minor and should not take long to implement.
That being said: give back the eye! The fun of fouling has been ruined by this overly simplistic change in the fouling rules. I don't see myself picking DP to my players either in the new editions. They just ain't cost-effective. |
_________________
"The only way to reduce crime, is to make it legal" |
|
SvenS
Joined: Jul 07, 2007
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 10:51 |
|
| veron wrote: | Okay, everyone please stay on the topic. If you want to discuss how DP should work or who should decide the future rules of the game, please do that in the right forum. This is not it.
Be nice and behave. If you have nothing constructive to say to the subject in hand, think twice if you should post at all. |
This.
Thx for making the offer to help out Babbs!
Clearly there has been too little "cross faction communication" earlier and reading this thread doesnt make it hard to understand why.. =(
Less time obsessing about past wrongs (and making new ones) and more focus on what can be done here on forward would be nice IMO.
That said it might be simpler to start out lrb5 and then upgrade to 6 later when "official".
Cheers |
_________________
IL-S
SL |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Oct 26, 2009 - 10:54 |
|
| Babs wrote: |
..and Kalamar - you are completely correct in that LRB 6 will be stat changes and minor rule tweaks in comparison. However, it appears that there's a 'split' in the community with deaf producing a client that is FUMBBL independant. Should I be making the same offer to him over on 'that other website'? |
Yes please. You can also PM Deaf here as he pops in from time to time.
IMO the whole thing can be done by PM if you want to avoid nosey parkers. 
Only Christer, Kalimar and Deaf really need to have this right now.
IMO it is worth having the new rules for planning purposes whether they intend to implement them straight away or not.
AFAIK Deaf's BOTOCS already uses the experimental rules so there is hopefully not much for him to do.
It would be nice to be able to choose between LRB5 and 6. I don't know if that was mentioned in the original requirements. |
_________________
[SL] + Official Stunty teams. Progression KO. Old & new teams welcome. 29th May! |
|
|
|
Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...
Search
