Angmarred
Joined: Feb 28, 2015
|
 Posted:
Jun 11, 2015 - 21:05 |
 
|
| xnoelx wrote: | | I wasn't really debating, just pointing out that saying "he goes down 20%" was, without more context and comparison, not relevant. |
I wasn't comparing him to the rookie replacement, nor was I attempting to justify the firing. Someone asked how often it comes up. I did some quick math in my head and got ~1/5 (I later used a calculator and realized its 1/6). To me that seems pretty relevant. |
|
|
tussock
Joined: May 29, 2011
|
| Posted:
Jul 13, 2015 - 08:02 |
|
People sack skilled players with injuries because you have to use them full on, so they get more skilled, and you're forever playing against +10 to +60 TV for your troubles. Replacing a wounded blodger with a rookie is of course worse, but it gets you more wins because the teams you play get worse even faster.
Great topic, BTW, enjoying. |
_________________
  |
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 13, 2015 - 08:27 |
|
Wasn't this really only 15 games in the Box? |
|
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Aug 28, 2015 - 21:38 |
|
If you ever fire this team back up, I suggest buying catchers.
They are game savers with the 8 MA & Sprint. They can easily out-position most bashy teams. |
|
|
RNG speculations
Search
