sheepycollins
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/8991006335616d2aa8445e.gif)
Joined: Sep 21, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 21, 2016 - 22:35 |
|
Nah penalty shoot out should be a pass off first person to drop the ball (by either failed pass or catch) loses |
_________________ Things I like and things I hate? I don't feel like telling you that. My dreams for the future? Never really thought about that. As for my hobbies... I have lots of hobbies. |
|
mrt1212
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/20457904475440aaf205319.jpg)
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
  Posted:
Sep 21, 2016 - 23:05 |
|
Yeah, lets think about introducing one of the dumbest ways to settle ties from a sport that's not even the closest analog to BB... |
|
|
tmoila
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/150123947256531940e2ae0.jpg)
Joined: Nov 25, 2012
|
  Posted:
Sep 21, 2016 - 23:15 |
|
I feel kicking (beating) players to solve the problem of equal number of pig bladder run-ins is a good way. |
_________________ gg |
|
Rbthma
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/16484743657e15f775c3ac.jpg)
Joined: Jan 14, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 21, 2016 - 23:57 |
|
How about you set-up for kick-off normally for both teams then a bunch of kind wizards fireball each square of the pitch. Whoever has the most players on the pitch afterwards wins but if there's the same amount of players then the pitch is fireballed again! There's your reward for getting the equalizer! ![Very Happy](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 00:05 |
|
Make it a Blitz event at default. If a blitz event occurs its not a blitz instead. |
|
|
sheepycollins
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/8991006335616d2aa8445e.gif)
Joined: Sep 21, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 01:40 |
|
mrt1212 wrote: | Yeah, lets think about introducing one of the dumbest ways to settle ties from a sport that's not even the closest analog to BB... |
Ok so 11 player line up on LOS only action allowed is block or blitz, whoever has most players standing after 1 Turn each wins |
_________________ Things I like and things I hate? I don't feel like telling you that. My dreams for the future? Never really thought about that. As for my hobbies... I have lots of hobbies. |
|
JackassRampant
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 02:00 |
|
The way we did it in my home league (when I had one) was overtime without a shootout: if nobody scores in OT it's a tie. |
_________________ Lude enixe, obliviscatur timor. |
|
Cavetroll
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/3688714054f341a78c7eac.jpg)
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 02:06 |
|
JackassRampant wrote: | The way we did it in my home league (when I had one) was overtime without a shootout: if nobody scores in OT it's a tie. |
If the OT option were ever introduced in Ranked/Blackbox (which I'm against), this is the best option I've heard. If you can't score in 24 turns, you deserve a draw. |
_________________
nerf indigo 2016 |
|
almic85
Joined: May 25, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 02:44 |
|
Don't know if it is technically possible, but I would not be interested in any/every game going into overtime in ranked unless it is in a tournament that needs a result to progress.
Draws are ok. You do not always need a winner and a loser. It is a good life lesson. |
_________________ SWL the place to be.
If you're interested join the Fringe |
|
mrt1212
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/20457904475440aaf205319.jpg)
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 05:21 |
|
Also with how slowly some play...OT would turn people off |
|
|
Munga
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 05:30 |
|
A gladiator style fight between halves. Last man standing wins a RR for his team. The loser takes an automatic injury. |
|
|
almic85
Joined: May 25, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 06:49 |
|
Munga wrote: | A gladiator style fight between halves. Last man standing wins a RR for his team. The loser takes an automatic injury. |
you mean like URL this?
Isn't his how you are meant to solve all your problems in a modern world?
[/url] |
_________________ SWL the place to be.
If you're interested join the Fringe |
|
ben_awesome
Joined: May 11, 2016
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 10:25 |
|
I these two quotes sum up why my idea was poorly thought out.
sheepycollins wrote: | The very essence of ranked play means every game must follow the same rules or how can you rank teams fairly? If you want to play games outside the usual ranked parameters go play league?? |
akaRenton wrote: | I think offering another way for people to avoid playing each other is probably not a step forward for ranked. |
Probably stop posting in the thread now. |
|
|
bghandras
Joined: Feb 06, 2011
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 10:38 |
|
Wreckage wrote: | Make it a Blitz event at default. If a blitz event occurs its not a blitz instead. |
I actually like it. Strange... |
_________________
![Image Image](https://fumbbl.com/i/486224) |
|
kummo
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/60514214257eba0be3d67d.jpg)
Joined: Mar 29, 2016
|
  Posted:
Sep 22, 2016 - 20:56 |
|
Pros of overtime is the that it would determinate who will actually win it.. but coin toss is so OP.. is it worth it? Bashy teams would get better win-% (unless they failed to bash and agility teams get to receive).
Cons are:
- there is no spp in overtime
- more time for opponent to kill your legend (and other best players)
Because of those cons i think that i wouldn't mostly play overtime. Win-% and determinating winning is one thing for sure.. but i also play because i want to skill my players.. and for that i want:
1) my players to be healthy (which overtime makes it harder to do)
2) my players must gain spps to skill-up (which overtime doesn't grant)
I'm not against idea of overtime. It's just that i wouldn't use it that much. |
|
|
|