Verminardo
Joined: Sep 27, 2006
|
 Posted:
Apr 22, 2014 - 23:04 |
 
|
This has been brought up before and Kalimar acknowledged that the way the client does it is the wrong order but the client does it the way it does for reasons that I fail to recall but that made me file the matter away as a case of "ah well".  |
|
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2014 - 23:12 |
|
| Verminardo wrote: | | the client does it the way it does for reasons that I fail to recall but that made me file the matter away as a case of "ah well". |
Hm, couldn't it place a square-getter in place of the pop-up window whether to use fend, put in a break to ignore shadowing and tentacles, perform the follow-up action, ask to use fend, if yes, call the getter... if no, call the getter and perform move again without the break for tents and shadowing?
Also, nevermind now, but please put it on the list for the next client then |
|
|
paradocks
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2014 - 23:50 |
|
I tend to think the rules committee never actually foresaw this issue arising... but I think Wreckage has an excellent point and would be an improvement |
|
|
All Star Bowl!
Search
