JimmyFantastic
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
|
 Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 20:26 |
 
|
| anisdrin wrote: |
I would only ask the admins to enforce 2 rules:
1. No naming and shaming.
2. Competitive play (just view the 1st half). |
Where would you draw the line? I think he played quite well in the first half. And he won the game.
Surely the competitive play rule is only to prevent collusion? |
_________________
Pull down the veil - actively bad for the hobby! |
|
Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 20:27 |
|
Hey lighten up everyone! What good are these forums if a bit of trash talking is not tolerated?  |
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 20:31 |
|
| JimmyFantastic wrote: |
Surely the competitive play rule is only to prevent collusion? |
Amen to that. Take over the administration please. |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 20:32 |
|
| JimmyFantastic wrote: | | anisdrin wrote: |
I would only ask the admins to enforce 2 rules:
1. No naming and shaming.
2. Competitive play (just view the 1st half). |
Where would you draw the line? I think he played quite well in the first half. And he won the game.
Surely the competitive play rule is only to prevent collusion? |
And griefing, like hitting end turn without moving the entire game. I trust the powers that be to spot uncompetitive play like that. |
|
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 20:33 |
|
Ranked coaches are so...
"Special" |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 21:06 |
|
|
CharlatanXIV
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 21:18 |
|
|
albinv
Joined: Sep 15, 2012
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 21:45 |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 21:51 |
|
also, "disgunting" is a cool word. |
_________________
 |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 21:53 |
|
| CharlatanXIV wrote: | | cameronhawkins wrote: | Eh... I can't speak to any rudeness in chat or elsewhere, but the bottom line is that you caused 13 casualties in 25 blocks and 4 fouls.
In other words, you utterly diced a Tier-3 team of mostly AV7 Stunties. Another way to put it is that you irrevocably mauled a team that was far, far more interesting than your own. Not your fault, per se –– no one's fault. But it hardly seems something to be proud of... |
Great i get it, i will apologies a third time, to an opponent who as insulting me. My apologies, i'm sorry you accepted this game when i had highlightened every possible opponent in the match making, if i could i would go in the past and let you win, like a gentlemen does. To anyone reading this, i might not sleep for days, not be able to eat and who knows, change my religion. As of tommorow, i'll only wear pink clothes to punish myself and to remind me of humility. |
pics or it did not happen (re the clothes) |
_________________
|
|
easilyamused
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 21:55 |
|
I have deleted 2 posts in this thread with links to the game.
Public name and shame is not allowed.
Next time I see someone do this in either a blog or forum post it's a 7 day block.
Have a good night ladies and gentlemen. |
_________________
 |
|
GronxWild
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 22:08 |
|
| cameronhawkins wrote: | Eh... I can't speak to any rudeness in chat or elsewhere, but the bottom line is that you caused 13 casualties in 25 blocks and 4 fouls.
In other words, you utterly diced a Tier-3 team of mostly AV7 Stunties. Another way to put it is that you irrevocably mauled a team that was far, far more interesting than your own. Not your fault, per se –– no one's fault. But it hardly seems something to be proud of... |
technically it s autoshaming XDD |
|
|
CastleMan
Joined: Apr 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 22:16 |
|
wait a minute, there are ladies on this site? |
|
|
King_Ghidra
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 22:18 |
|
I'm always intrigued by the no naming and shaming thing. Where actually is that in the site rules?
All I see from the site rules is:
| Quote: | | Personal attacks and excessive abusive language is not accepted. Discussing other people's styles of play does not qualify as personal attacks. |
| Quote: | | Publishing the names of other coaches, or links to such information, on FUMBBL is allowed |
And the forum etiquette post has nothing about it. |
|
|
Overhamsteren
Joined: May 27, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 15, 2014 - 22:28 |
|
So making it abundantly clear who and what you are talking about and talking trash about this 'mystery' coach is ok as long as you don't put a link in for the lazy peeps. Seems fair and balanced.  |
_________________
Like a Tiger Defying the Laws of Gravity
Thanks to the BBRC for all the great work you did. |
|
|
|
Gnome Roster - how a...
Search
