harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
 Posted:
Dec 08, 2014 - 16:22 |
 
|
| SpadesOfJack wrote: | | harvestmouse wrote: | | How many gamers would be interested in playing a FUMBBL type version of Warhammer? I'd jump at the chance. |
Heck, the only reason I never got into Warhammer was because of the overwhelming IMMENSITY of it and trying to find people at the local game shops that play it. A FUMMBLHammer game would completely destroy what little social life I have, but it'd be SO worth it.  |
Yeah I totally agree. They could make a lot of money out of me selling armies and specialist units individually.
There is an online platform for playing Warhammer, but you don't have the ease of play with FUMBBL. Nothing is automated, which is difficult. |
|
|
Christer
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| koadah wrote: | | That is interesting. What data did you give them? We didn't have an LRB5 client. Was that the Vault? Or was it more than that? |
It was early on, and stuff like TR development for different races, number of skills over number of games. Mainly basic balancing type information. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2014 - 17:44 |
|
| Christer wrote: | | koadah wrote: | | That is interesting. What data did you give them? We didn't have an LRB5 client. Was that the Vault? Or was it more than that? |
It was early on, and stuff like TR development for different races, number of skills over number of games. Mainly basic balancing type information. |
OK. I was thinking more of "real" LRB5 match data.
| harvestmouse wrote: | | I think League could encompass that all. I agree with the top brass, that we don't want another division right now. |
Well, it has no scheduler. 
You also cannot apply house rules to open games.
| harvestmouse wrote: |
Well we did have an lrb 5 division, however it was using the old client so it was a half way house, actually it wasn't even a half way house as the site was coded for lrb 4. I tell you what would be interesting, if the old client (I'm not suggesting we should go back to it, Kalimar's has far more potential) with the out of game add ons from CRP and the new skills. I'd be interested to see where BB would be with that. |
Not sure what you mean there. Being able to load XML/JSON rosters would be cool. To be able to use Kalimar's client to play 'off Fumbbl' games. Might not need that when we have custom rosters though.
Some LRB4 style options would be nice. +2 fouling, The eye etc. |
_________________
[SL] + Official Stunty teams. Progression KO. Old & new teams welcome. 29th May! |
|
Christer
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| koadah wrote: | | You also cannot apply house rules to open games. |
... yet. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2014 - 18:43 |
|
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2014 - 19:34 |
|
| Christer wrote: | | koadah wrote: | | You also cannot apply house rules to open games. |
... yet. |
/ooh |
|
|
Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...
Search
