Two days ago i was aksed from a trainer for a match with our nearly rookie teams, and we started to play. Game starts fine and we did a little small talk. In Turn 5 i got the chance to score. My opponent told me, if i try to stall, he will end match. But i thought i would not take the risk for my aggility team to get bashed from his bashing team (with stalling i could prevent the setup because i started with defense) and so i decidet to stall, and i thought if he would'nd play if i stalling he should concede. But he didn't concede, instead he left the game without any coment oO. In chat he told me, i should check his profile. There stand, stalling player shouldn't offer him a match, ah. Hm, I sayed to him, he man, u ask me for the match and he answered: "Oh aha, its happend". To end the game regular, i peg him to rejoin and i will make the touch down directly.
He rejoined and played his turn, but don't wrote any word from this point till the end. I managed to make a 2nd TD but there was no word along, instead he begann to foul every turn till the end and play a destructife game without any interest to make a TD. After game he left, again without any word. In chat i thank him for the game and told him, that i wonder about his behavior, and i think it was very immature. He didnt answer again.

Now i ask myself, did i make the fault by dont read his
profile when he ask me? Surely he faild with his behavior, but is it a common practise to quit? Is it a reason to quit if an opponend stall and i didnt like this kind of game. Not in my oppinion otherwise i didn't do it, but a fact is, that i am not be the expirienced coach (signed in about a month ago) and may i did a misstake by didn't concider the common fumbbl exposure.

thanks for reading and comments, greatings wolfgang

p.s. again, sorry for my bad english, hope the text is understandable