Christer
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
FYI, I have no intention of working in tournaments into B at this point. This doesn't mean it won't ever happen but there will not be any tournament any time soon. |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 26, 2008 - 15:44 |
|
Christer wrote: | FYI, I have no intention of working in tournaments into B at this point. This doesn't mean it won't ever happen but there will not be any tournament any time soon. |
Thanks for the clarification.
To know that they might happen 'one day' is enough for me. |
|
|
westerner
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
|
  Posted:
Nov 26, 2008 - 15:58 |
|
Christer wrote: | FYI, I have no intention of working in tournaments into B at this point. This doesn't mean it won't ever happen but there will not be any tournament any time soon. |
Understood.
Will BR be visible once Blackbox goes live? |
_________________ \x/es |
|
Pro511
Joined: Aug 14, 2006
|
  Posted:
Nov 26, 2008 - 16:02 |
|
Christer wrote: | Pro511 wrote: | How is a Smack not already Blackbox? |
Blackbox doesn't commit you to more than one game. |
Of course. A smack is a "blackbox" tournament, no?
Based solely on a TR range.
Again, the number 1 reason why I like them. |
_________________ Previously intelligent. |
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
  Posted:
Nov 27, 2008 - 11:39 |
|
SillySod wrote: | Team Ranking (as a CR type value) would be perfect for [B]. It avoids all of the nasty "I cant start a team" problems and it makes it easy to do rankings for each race and it means that you cant play rubbish to achieve a higher BR.
To be honest, I could probably be content to forget about tournaments in [B] for at least a year if there was a decent BR system for each team.. I'd really enjoy trying to compete for the best team in a particular race (and since you cant exclude teams from the box players would have to maintain their BR, they wouldnt be able to just hibernate it). |
Agree with this anyway (per-team BR) |
|
|
Christer
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
Pro511 wrote: | Of course. A smack is a "blackbox" tournament, no? |
Well, I would not say that since the rounds after the first are predictable. But I suppose that's mostly sematics and not really that relevant to the topic. |
|
|
|
| |