funnyfingers
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 02:10 |
|
|
Wyrmtainter
Joined: Nov 30, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 02:32 |
|
Should I take A or B cannot be answered by Yes or No |
|
|
Paragon
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 03:02 |
|
Wyrmtainter wrote: | Should I take A or B cannot be answered by Yes or No |
Sure it can:
Yes: he should take the strength or use the doubles
No: he should take a normal skill, or retire the team, or maybe just quit FUMBBL because he can't stand the special treatment he's been given by Nuffle |
|
|
Bunchwacky
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 03:10 |
|
Well there you have it. He couldn't answer the question as it stood until someone clarified it. It's like asking "What's the difference between a duck?" |
|
|
Lomack
Joined: Jun 25, 2008
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 03:11 |
|
Got to say I'm with Wyrmtainter on this one. |
|
|
Lithuran
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 03:23 |
|
Paragon wrote: | Wyrmtainter wrote: | Should I take A or B cannot be answered by Yes or No |
Sure it can:
Yes: he should take the strength or use the doubles
No: he should take a normal skill, or retire the team, or maybe just quit FUMBBL because he can't stand the special treatment he's been given by Nuffle |
Ahh thanks, a clear no then. |
|
|
liquidorange
Joined: Feb 08, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 03:49 |
|
From the article: "If the player has a skill that modifies armour roll in addition to Razor Sharp Claws add 1 to the player value."
This should read "... in addition to Claw...", as Razor Sharp Claws don't modify armour rolls, they modify injury rolls. |
|
|
asharak
Joined: Nov 27, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 05:27 |
|
I was presuming that meant either Claw or MB in combination with RSC gave the increase. In which case it seems to me that Claw & MB is better than MB/RSC as it dodges the increase! |
_________________ Give a man a fire and he will be warm for the rest of the day.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life. |
|
Arktoris
Joined: Feb 16, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 06:05 |
|
Yes..take the strength or the doubles. |
_________________ Hail to Manowar! The latest charioteer to DIE for bloodbowl! - Slain, by Ghor Oggaz |
|
Mr_Foulscumm
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 06:13 |
|
Finally a topic that makes sense.
I give the poll five stars. |
_________________ Everybody's favorite coach on FUMBBL |
|
arv9673
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 08:50 |
|
no, take DP, you silly Sod!!! |
|
|
Optihut
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 09:57 |
|
Bunchwacky wrote: | Well there you have it. He couldn't answer the question as it stood until someone clarified it. It's like asking "What's the difference between a duck?" |
Thanks a lot, now I'm curious what the difference between a duck is |
|
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 10:12 |
|
funnyfingers wrote: | http://fumbbl.com/help:Strength
I added that Dirty Player adds an additional +1 TS. not sure how anything else is affected. |
This should read: "Dirty Player adds the default value plus 1 further point." The other factors that changed recently were halfling chef costings (now 9TS each including the free one) and the way that halflings are costed (I suspect some kind of very halfling specific modifier as I've found it hard to determine). Adding wizards, runesmiths, and masterchefs into the base TS section wouldnt be a bad idea.
liquidorange wrote: | From the article: "If the player has a skill that modifies armour roll in addition to Razor Sharp Claws add 1 to the player value."
This should read "... in addition to Claw...", as Razor Sharp Claws don't modify armour rolls, they modify injury rolls. |
Incorrect. This refers to claw, MB, or piling on.... since skills that are more likely to break the armour make RSC more likely to be used and hence more valuable. I think this is a horrible undervaluation of claw/RSC but it is how the current system works |
_________________ Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
Enar
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 10:15 |
|
Optihut wrote: | Bunchwacky wrote: | Well there you have it. He couldn't answer the question as it stood until someone clarified it. It's like asking "What's the difference between a duck?" |
Thanks a lot, now I'm curious what the difference between a duck is |
It quacks? |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Feb 08, 2009 - 10:29 |
|
I`m not sure... is this a case of updating the documentation or do you rather wish DP would cost +1 and thought editing the TS-formula page would make it happen? |
|
|
|