belshamharoth
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
|
 Posted:
Oct 04, 2009 - 22:58 |
 
|
|
phil78
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 00:10 |
|
My ratsare looking for a friendly as well. |
|
|
nThatch
Joined: Jan 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 00:37 |
|
umm, isnt this entirely illegal due to fumbbl`s rulings about pre-arranging matches? |
|
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 00:56 |
|
No. |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
Purplegoo
Joined: Mar 23, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 08:24 |
|
|
Reisender
Joined: Sep 29, 2007
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 09:49 |
|
yeah BAN the WIL from Fumbbl NOW! (  ) |
|
|
Rijssiej
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 10:05 |
|
Hiya,
My weak dorfs with no claw, no RSC, no DP and only a few MB (less than half their players) wouldn't mind an easy win vs your 5-6 players.
Greetings,
Rijssiej
|
|
|
Archevol
Joined: Dec 14, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 10:24 |
|
yeah... sorry 'bout that belshamroth... That's several tough games in a row now for you. |
|
|
Sizzler
Joined: Apr 23, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 17:30 |
|
|
belshamharoth
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 21:50 |
|
sorry this cherry has now been picked by a fine offer of 19FF and only 1 MB see u next season end with a similar offer no doubt  |
|
|
nThatch
Joined: Jan 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 23:14 |
|
So, agreeing to have a friendly game in Ranked isnt against the rules?
Here I was thinking, for several years, that pre agreeing game specifics was against the rules.
So, for example. I now understand that i can agree a foul free game in chat.
Isnt any form of agreeing how the match will go against the site rules?
Edit: I realize this wasnt in Ranked. |
|
|
belshamharoth
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 23:21 |
|
hence the forum area it was posted |
|
|
belshamharoth
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 23:22 |
|
Besides i never said i wanted to play a team that didnt foul i just said no DPS and this is legal in ranked as u choose what teams you play against everytime u accept or decline a match only in BBox do you not do this |
|
|
James_Probert
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 23:22 |
|
| nThatch wrote: |
So, agreeing to have a friendly game in Ranked isnt against the rules?
Here I was thinking, for several years, that pre agreeing game specifics was against the rules.
So, for example. I now understand that i can agree a foul free game in chat.
Isnt any form of agreeing how the match will go against the site rules?
Edit: I realize this wasnt in Ranked. |
no it's not because or this
| Fumbbl Rules wrote: | Starting Matches
* Do not discuss or agree on in-game events. This includes agreeing on not fouling or behaviour that implies an agreement such as clicking end turn for a significant part of the game. |
as for this particular game, nowhere has Belshamharoth asked for someone to go soft on him, he was simply advertizing his team as a nice juicy cherry for a league friendly, but would choose his opponent carefully.
EDIT: he did say no Claw RSC, so was asking for a "relatively" sort game |
|
|
Shades_SteelFist
Joined: Sep 11, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 05, 2009 - 23:26 |
|
Another Dorf team with hardly any MB, (just the slayers, but thats there job right) looking for a friendly...
166/152 any takers? |
_________________
Nuffle is cruel but we love him still |
|
|
|
Finishing the 60 Gam...
Search
