xcver
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
|
 Posted:
Jan 13, 2008 - 11:54 |
 
|
mhhh some of the nasty teams enter smacks because they wouldn't get games otherwise so I don't know if that would hurt them too much (i.e. Eaters, Judgement and so on). But the fragile ones would enter it and would have a descent chance to get beaten to pulp just to enter the tournament.
| AFK_Eagle wrote: | | ...Are we seeing a trend here? Where are all the elves, the humans/norse/zons, the other rats? |
There was indeed a trend in the FC for the longer lasting teams. Just a natural Choice regarding the number of rounds there. As I see it there are more player teams in the WO and even more that are strong enough to survive those 4 rounds alive enough to be a threat in the final round. |
_________________
"Power without perception is virtually useless and therefore of no true value!" - Ryouken - Master of the Hokuto no Ken Martial Arts |
|
deckerCKY
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jan 14, 2008 - 04:09 |
|
| shadow46x2 wrote: | how many coaches here do you really think care about where they're seeded?
i've played in a boatload of tourneys, and never once have i cared about how i'm seeded...granted i've been bummed about a bad draw, but that happens to everyone, and the potential for a bad draw is just as possible with modified seeding...
--j |
Consider if you fill in from the top with points from tournaments, then fill in the rest by TR in descending order. The team with the most success would start by facing lower TR teams that don't have much success. That's probably as good of a seeding system as you could get considering the format of the league. |
|
|
nin
Joined: May 27, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jan 15, 2008 - 14:32 |
|
similar thread by Flix
just in case
the topick is the same, and there were more oppinions
Edit: and my own oppinion remains the same, FC should remain oppen to all coaches, but one of the majors, the GLT, could make use of this idea. |
|
|
Secret League Americ...
Search
