14 coaches online • Server time: 05:56
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Gnomes are trashgoto Post FDL only 3 spots lef...goto Post Secret League Americ...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
johan



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Jan 06, 2009 - 16:28 Reply with quote Back to top

Flix didn't get 78% at his current BR level. He did it throughout his Black Box career, which obviously started at the baseline and then moved upwards. And I doubt that many coaches have yet reached their full potential BR either - that probably takes a fair amount of matches. This is just guesswork, however, since we don't know how BR is calculated.

_________________
”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”

—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess
westerner



Joined: Jul 02, 2008

Post   Posted: Jan 06, 2009 - 16:50 Reply with quote Back to top

That is true. It would be worth looking at win% next to average TS difference to see how the two are correlated.

I've been told (by someone who reportedly heard it from Christer) that BR works the same as CR.

_________________
\x/es
TheCetusProject



Joined: May 25, 2004

Post   Posted: Jan 06, 2009 - 19:47 Reply with quote Back to top

koadah wrote:
PurpleChest wrote:
westerner wrote:
TS disadvantage can be considered a badge of pride in the Box. Smile If it happens consistently it means you're a strong coach.


and often means you will be coming back to [R].


But as more coaches gain high BR is should be safe for you high BR (I assume) guys to return to [B] Wink


Unfortunately this does not work as well as it could, since the scheduler does not consider an even match against a close BR opponent intrinsically better that an uneven match against a wildly different BR opponent. Ideally we would want a scheduler where matches that are close in both TS and BR are preferred to everything else.
johan



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Jan 07, 2009 - 00:22 Reply with quote Back to top

westerner wrote:
I think there's very few cases of consistent -10 to -15TS matches. Almost all reported cases of TS-disadvantage I've looked at have averaged out to less than 5TS.


On my last seven matches, I've clocked in at -14, -12, -6, -8, -7, -8, -14 (all counting handicaps). So that's a -10 average lately.

_________________
”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”

—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess
westerner



Joined: Jul 02, 2008

Post   Posted: Jan 07, 2009 - 00:34 Reply with quote Back to top

But if I look at your last 10 matches, which is the sample I've been using for other reported cases, I get an average of -8.8TS and +0.5 handis, which is -6.3TS total. EDIT: which is more than 5TS. Thanks for raising.

-19/1 vs easilyamused W
7/-3 W
-22/3 W
2/-2 W
-11/1 L
-32/4 W
-4/-2 W
8/0 W
-6/0 D
-11/3 W vs hermano_p

_________________
\x/es
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic