Cortelll
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Dec 08, 2004 - 14:20 |
 
|
I think the main problem is that when you play with vampires you feel most of the time outnumbered by the casualties that you have caused to yourself. I think if they would include a Vampire lord 6/5/4/9 regenerate,hypotic gaze would add some value to the team as you would have 1 vampire that would be able to make plays for your team without depending on rerolls to control him |
_________________
Cortelll
Bloodbowl World Cup
Vamps Group |
|
MadMarx
Joined: Aug 14, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2004 - 14:36 |
|
Vamps do suck, in at least two possible ways of the phrase. With some help in the rules, they could be a damn good team. As it is, they are a funny way to commit suicide. |
|
|
Cloggy
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2004 - 14:42 |
|
Vamps should be ok. I fully agree with the previous poster that suggested to always, ALWAYS take pro as a first skill on vamps. The combination of the broad skills access and good basic stats should then make vampires formidable opponents.
You just can't get away with a starting lineup with 5 vampires and 1 reroll, thats all  |
|
|
Arlecchino
Joined: Feb 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2004 - 18:47 |
|
1)Halfing
2)Goblin
3)Vampire
4)Norse
Ogre worst? At high tr with 12 ogre, only elves can win vs them! |
|
|
ramchop takes on the...
Search
