Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 21:32 |
|
Shadowing would be my guess, probs titchy as well |
_________________
|
|
PurpleChest
Joined: Oct 25, 2003
|
I think with the skink runners described as fast, we'll see Chameleons lose an MA or even two, then add sneaky git and possibly one more, I'd love it to be Foul Appearance but suspect it might be shadowing. |
_________________ Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor illis -Ovid
I am a barbarian here because i am not understood by anyone |
|
ph0enyx13
Joined: Nov 14, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 21:42 |
|
I think they are going to give the chameleon skinks monstrous mouth |
|
|
akuku88
Joined: Sep 07, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 21:57 |
|
ph0enyx13 wrote: | I think they are going to give the chameleon skinks monstrous mouth |
What is the exact wording of Monstrous Mouth skill? I can't find it. :/ |
|
|
Rawlf
Joined: Jul 15, 2007
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 22:06 |
|
They like to have skills in line with the minis (see gutterrunners), so the tongue snatching the ball will be something. Pass block could be called a sneaky move.
Or they are titchy catchers, that could pass as sneaky too. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 22:10 |
|
akuku88 wrote: | ph0enyx13 wrote: | I think they are going to give the chameleon skinks monstrous mouth |
What is the exact wording of Monstrous Mouth skill? I can't find it. :/ | rr catch and strip ball doesn't work against you |
_________________
|
|
ph0enyx13
Joined: Nov 14, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 22:14 |
|
akuku88 wrote: | ph0enyx13 wrote: | I think they are going to give the chameleon skinks monstrous mouth |
What is the exact wording of Monstrous Mouth skill? I can't find it. :/ |
"Monstrous Mouth (Extraordinary)"
"A player with a Monstrous Mouth is allowed to re-roll the D6 if they fail a Catch roll. It also allows the player to re-roll a D6 if they drop a hand-off or fail to make an interception. In addition, the Strip Ball skill will not work against a player with a Monstrous Mouth." |
|
|
Chivite
Joined: Sep 04, 2017
|
  Posted:
Sep 29, 2019 - 22:25 |
|
I would have thought a simple diving catch, as they use the sticky tongue to get +1 to catch and are able to catch from 1 square apart, the sneakyness could be a reference to either sidestep or even tichy! as they are harder to stop moving through people with their camouflage up. I also would be surprised if they lose more than 1 ma, but i wouldnt be surprised either if they lost 1 av too, so my guess is 7236 stunty, tichy, diving catch, dodge.
EDIT
They also look fisically smaller, so they might loose 1 strength, if that was to happen then they would defo get tichy |
|
|
PurpleChest
Joined: Oct 25, 2003
|
guesses here are taken as guesses for what they will actually be.
the FUMBBL Podcast episode 27 is running a competition asking what SHOULD they be? fun or real feel free to enter.
PM's to myself or Throweck or via our Discord sub channel 'FUMBBL Podcast' |
_________________ Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor illis -Ovid
I am a barbarian here because i am not understood by anyone |
|
Chivite
Joined: Sep 04, 2017
|
  Posted:
Oct 03, 2019 - 15:04 |
|
7237 shadowing pass block stunty dodge confirmed by gw in their community page |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Oct 03, 2019 - 15:09 |
|
Price? |
_________________
|
|
Harad
Joined: May 11, 2014
|
  Posted:
Oct 03, 2019 - 15:23 |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Oct 03, 2019 - 15:33 |
|
Hmm interesting. There is a new rule book coming. Though I assumed it was just to tidy up all the mistakes they've listed online. I wonder if PO might become non optional again? |
_________________
|
|
Harad
Joined: May 11, 2014
|
  Posted:
Oct 03, 2019 - 15:42 |
|
As it stands, am I right that it creates a situations where one would be trying to use a reroll but as it's a star player you would have the loner rules meaning that it could only happen if your rolled a 4+ first?
It's possible that the thinking hasn't been rigorous |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Oct 03, 2019 - 15:44 |
|
Harad wrote: | As it stands, am I right that it creates a situations where one would be trying to use a reroll but as it's a star player you would have the loner rules meaning that it could only happen if your rolled a 4+ first?
It's possible that the thinking hasn't been rigorous |
Indeed. Unless the new rulebook changes PO again |
_________________
|
|
|