vitas
Joined: Jul 31, 2008
|
 Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 10:52 |
 
|
|
spelledaren
Joined: Mar 06, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 10:54 |
|
Well, I think no, not right now. Once you have the cash for a new tree and enough other players, sure.
And that's too bad, MA3 trees are nice. |
_________________
FUMBBL! |
|
rami
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 10:54 |
|
i would wait till u got the dough to replace him, but then he's out |
|
|
Calcium
Joined: Apr 08, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 10:55 |
|
Tough one. Normally yeah, but treemen are always gonna be punch sponges. Whack him on the LOS and let him die with honour. But when he misses a game...OUCH! Shame he niggled, the +MV is the holy grail of treemen skills! |
_________________
 |
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 11:13 |
|
hold onto him until you have the money to replace him and won't be under 11-12 players |
|
|
Were_M_Eye
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 11:15 |
|
|
f0rd
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 11:15 |
|
Fire him |
_________________
Chuck Norris can divide by zero. |
|
Rijssiej
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 11:25 |
|
keep and hope he gets more niggles  |
|
|
zakatan
Joined: May 17, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 11:40 |
|
send him back to the forest |
_________________
 |
|
westerner
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 16:12 |
|
Keep him because of the MA3. The 5/6 times he plays will outweigh what a 6/6 new treeman will do for you. A new treeman won't save you much TS either (about 3TS). |
_________________
\x/es |
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 16:21 |
|
So because of MA 3, he will save the elves from being blocked more often? That is only if he usually spends ALOT of time on his back and you have long drives.
Replace him as soon as possible. |
|
|
westerner
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 16:53 |
|
| CircularLogic wrote: | | So because of MA 3, he will save the elves from being blocked more often? That is only if he usually spends ALOT of time on his back and you have long drives. |
Yes. Each time an MA2 treeman gets knocked down, he spends two turns on his back on average (mine always seem to take longer). I think the standup certainty balances out the niggle uncertainty. Add in the Break Tackle capabilities and I think that outweighs a new treeman. The money saved can be used for elves.
I don't think you should fire nigglers in B to the same degree as in R. |
_________________
\x/es |
|
Emphasy
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 16:56 |
|
If you have to ask, then its a given yes! |
|
|
Vanguard
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 15, 2008 - 18:05 |
|
no,
but fire the 3 assi coaches soon.
i am no real fan of treeman, but if you wana use one, he is the go to guy 
the ma 3 changes much.
and he will be fouled soon, suffer a nig and you will say , glad its no new treeman and save the apo for the gfi snakes dead on the wardancer  (which will fail).
you dont rely on a treeman, but its nice to have one, and even nicer if he can stand up |
|
|
|
|
SWL Season CI
Search
