41 coaches online • Server time: 12:06
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post killing by fun?goto Post Pact/Renegades metagoto Post custom pitch per tea...
SearchSearch 
[B]ashbox (Waaahhhhgg!)
 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
FUMBBL Forum Index » Divisions » Blackbox
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
spubbbba



Joined: Jul 31, 2006
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 00:55 Reply with quote Back to top
bicarbonateofsteve wrote:
but i am bored of people whining about Blackbox.


Seconded, but about a month ago.

_________________
British or British based and looking to join a League?
Then check out theWhite Isle Fringe
westerner



Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 01:22 Reply with quote Back to top
I am bored of people who don't play [B] griefing about [B] discussions in the [B] forum.

_________________
\x/es
Snappy_Dresser



Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 03:51 Reply with quote Back to top
amen westerner

_________________
<PurpleChest> the way it splooshed got me so excited

"I hear that shadow is a douchebag"
-Mr Foulscumm
Catalyst32



Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 04:33 Reply with quote Back to top
For variety purposes why not create a rule that say you must submit 2 teams (or 3 teams) to the Black Box.
And at least 1 of the 2 (or 3) {or 2 of the 3} MUST be teams not considered to be bashers.
I think NWL's rules of what is a BASHER, BALLER or BETWEENER is appropriate to determine this.
This would allow a better diversity and would actually allow for some of the matchups you can't get in Ranked.
What do you think?
Kill-Kill



Joined: Nov 22, 2004
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 04:49 Reply with quote Back to top
Catalyst32 wrote:
For variety purposes why not create a rule that say you must submit 2 teams (or 3 teams) to the Black Box.
And at least 1 of the 2 (or 3) {or 2 of the 3} MUST be teams not considered to be bashers.
I think NWL's rules of what is a BASHER, BALLER or BETWEENER is appropriate to determine this.
This would allow a better diversity and would actually allow for some of the matchups you can't get in Ranked.
What do you think?



....

No.

_________________
Your words are just bloody fallacy
A house of cards, painted white
Tried to recreate Normandy
But you made up the reasons to fight
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 04:56 Reply with quote Back to top
Catalyst32 wrote:
For variety purposes why not create a rule that say you must submit 2 teams (or 3 teams) to the Black Box.
And at least 1 of the 2 (or 3) {or 2 of the 3} MUST be teams not considered to be bashers.
I think NWL's rules of what is a BASHER, BALLER or BETWEENER is appropriate to determine this.
This would allow a better diversity and would actually allow for some of the matchups you can't get in Ranked.
What do you think?


Yes
westerner



Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 05:53 Reply with quote Back to top
@Catalyst:
Yes, conditionally.

If you submit a balanced group of 3 teams as you describe, then you're able to leave some of your teams out (combining with the off-season idea from the other thread).

My idea is that bonus-type incentives for diversity would be preferable to a mandatory quota.

_________________
\x/es
shadow46x2



Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 08:04 Reply with quote Back to top
i had a thought on how to balance things out....

split all of the teams into seperate categories....for example purposes, something similar to the categories that SWL/NWL uses....

any coach wishing to partake in the box has to have an even amount from each category...if you retire teams, you must build a new one for the retired divisions to remain compliant...if you are not compliant, you may not activate in the box...

ie: if you have 1 from category A, you have to have 1 from B & C also....if you have 2 in category A, you have to have two in B & C also...

also, the bonus for activating a specific team over another can still apply....

this will actually achieve two things....it'll encourage diversity, but still allow people to pick and choose what races they want to play within a limited range, while still allowing people to choose a preferred team in the activation system....also, it'll give the bot more team options when trying to compare for a matchup..

the only potential downside, is people not liking being forced to play races that they don't like...but in all fairness, i think there are very few coaches who couldn't find 3 different categorized races they don't enjoy playing...

--j

_________________
origami wrote:
There is no god but Nuffle, and Shadow is his prophet.

ImageImage
veron



Joined: Aug 02, 2003
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 08:10 Reply with quote Back to top
Think someone beat ya to it, shadow Wink
Snappy_Dresser



Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 08:42 Reply with quote Back to top
As long as one of the categories isn't all elves, I'm ok with that. I still think it's dumb, but enough people have bees in their bonnet about it that something will end up getting done, probably to the detriment of [B]. We may as well do it in such a way that the division isn't totally screwed up, and this is the least retarded option I've seen.

_________________
<PurpleChest> the way it splooshed got me so excited

"I hear that shadow is a douchebag"
-Mr Foulscumm
Kondor



Joined: Apr 04, 2008
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 08:46 Reply with quote Back to top
Least retarded, yet retarded. So you play against fewer bashers. Big harry deal. If that is your agenda, play in ranked.

I say this despite the fact that I would be compliant under this circumstance.
CircularLogic



Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 10:44 Reply with quote Back to top
veron wrote:
Think someone beat ya to it, shadow Wink


I think so, too. By about 2 months... Razz
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 11:16 Reply with quote Back to top
Kondor wrote:
Least retarded, yet retarded. So you play against fewer bashers. Big harry deal. If that is your agenda, play in ranked.

I say this despite the fact that I would be compliant under this circumstance.


we bow before the wisdom of some 240 odd games...
sk8bcn



Joined: Apr 13, 2004
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 11:38 Reply with quote Back to top
Kondor wrote:
Least retarded, yet retarded. So you play against fewer bashers. Big harry deal. If that is your agenda, play in ranked.

I say this despite the fact that I would be compliant under this circumstance.


I'd propose you get a scheduler that increase your proba of playing one single identical team by 100%

Maybe, after 20 games against dorfs you will start to understand something.

_________________
Join NL Raises from the Ashes
Snappy_Dresser



Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Post   Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 12:21 Reply with quote Back to top
If that's your [B] experience I'm sorry. But it's not my experience, nor is it any but an extremely vocal (and I suspect at least partially full of it) minority. And since I don't think I've ever seen you in [B], skate bacon old chap, why do you care?

_________________
<PurpleChest> the way it splooshed got me so excited

"I hear that shadow is a douchebag"
-Mr Foulscumm
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 FUMBBL Forum Index » Divisions » Blackbox