38 coaches online • Server time: 12:31
* * * Did you know? The most aggressive player is Taku the Second with 6628 blocks.
Recent Forum Topics  Blood Bowl 2024 Edit... | RNG speculations | SWL Season CI |
Match Result · Competitive division
Match recorded on 2022-10-10 15:35:56
95k
1/1/1
Player Performances
comp
cas
def
int
td
mvp
spp
turns
pass
rush
block
foul
TOTALS
1
3
-
-
2
1
17
149
5
27
45
1
#4 Big Tusk – Serious Injury (NI)
#8 'eavy Metal – Serious Injury (NI)
Player Performances
comp
cas
def
int
td
mvp
spp
turns
pass
rush
block
foul
TOTALS
-
1
-
-
-
1
6
147
-
13
41
1
#6 Cody Solon – Serious Injury (NI)
#11 Abraham Orken – Dead (RIP)
“Quad skull gave Undead a 1d blitz on ball carrier because the Orc ball carrier was left unprotected and just 1 square away from the End Zone's corner without Stand Firm or Side Step, thus making the ball easily thrown-in in case of knock down (as it happened when he got blitzed by a Ghoul).
Then to score, on turn 8 an Orc Blitzer with PA 5+ managed to pick up the ball (which had been thrown-in along the left Undead Wide Zone, adjacent to boundary line the turn before), make 2 GFIs and pass to the original ball carrier (avoiding the Ghoul's potential deflection and Animosity as well) who had 1d blitzed the Ghoul who knocked him down the turn before.
Without multiple rr (or just with average dice) that play would have not happened.
On 2nd Half the Ghoul was not sacked, he failed 2 GFIs with 2 rrs (which were a way more likely sequence than the ridiculous Orc passing sequence at end of Half 1).
This ruleset forgives positioning mistakes thanks to multiple rr and rewards Inducements abuse over solid gameplay.
Well, the replay proves what I wrote, the replay can't be accused to be one-eyed. My opponent couldn't screen a ball carrier yet managed to score thanks to multiple rr and luck.
And I'm not even talking about his unfair offers on Gamefinder. Always bad match-ups for me, never a fair offer. If I'm arrogant, he's a picker for sure, assisted by a ruleset favouring noobs (cheap Bomber, cheap Wizard, multiple rrs, no Re-Draft yet after months of BB2020 implementation).
It's really nice to see people abusing cheap Inducements getting on a high horse and judging other people as bitter and arrogant.
Describing Orcs sacking a ball carrier who failed 2 GFIs with rr seems one-eyed to me. They didn't actively sack him, they just picked up the ball after the failed GFI.
The same goes for the quad skull. Had the Orc ball carrier been protected (for example by another Guard Blitzer close to him) the 1d blitz would have been impossible. Quad skull was unlucky, but not protecting the ball carrier so close to End Zone and Side Line was careless.
If this is one-eyed... well then the replay is one-eyed.
That said, since I'm not interested in debating with hypocrite trolls never admitting facts, end of any communication with this biological entity, either in game or here. Not worth the wear and tear of my keyboard.”
Then to score, on turn 8 an Orc Blitzer with PA 5+ managed to pick up the ball (which had been thrown-in along the left Undead Wide Zone, adjacent to boundary line the turn before), make 2 GFIs and pass to the original ball carrier (avoiding the Ghoul's potential deflection and Animosity as well) who had 1d blitzed the Ghoul who knocked him down the turn before.
Without multiple rr (or just with average dice) that play would have not happened.
On 2nd Half the Ghoul was not sacked, he failed 2 GFIs with 2 rrs (which were a way more likely sequence than the ridiculous Orc passing sequence at end of Half 1).
This ruleset forgives positioning mistakes thanks to multiple rr and rewards Inducements abuse over solid gameplay.
Well, the replay proves what I wrote, the replay can't be accused to be one-eyed. My opponent couldn't screen a ball carrier yet managed to score thanks to multiple rr and luck.
And I'm not even talking about his unfair offers on Gamefinder. Always bad match-ups for me, never a fair offer. If I'm arrogant, he's a picker for sure, assisted by a ruleset favouring noobs (cheap Bomber, cheap Wizard, multiple rrs, no Re-Draft yet after months of BB2020 implementation).
It's really nice to see people abusing cheap Inducements getting on a high horse and judging other people as bitter and arrogant.
Describing Orcs sacking a ball carrier who failed 2 GFIs with rr seems one-eyed to me. They didn't actively sack him, they just picked up the ball after the failed GFI.
The same goes for the quad skull. Had the Orc ball carrier been protected (for example by another Guard Blitzer close to him) the 1d blitz would have been impossible. Quad skull was unlucky, but not protecting the ball carrier so close to End Zone and Side Line was careless.
If this is one-eyed... well then the replay is one-eyed.
That said, since I'm not interested in debating with hypocrite trolls never admitting facts, end of any communication with this biological entity, either in game or here. Not worth the wear and tear of my keyboard.”
Orcs attack was straightforward, with Undead benching the best Ghoul(s) and hanging back.
Bomber did nothing useful with bombs, but likely affected the tactics of the Undead.
Quad skulls gave undead a 1D blitz on ball, orcs were just able to recover and score 1-0
Manus Mortis 1TTD was attempt not completed. Pitch invasion made it harder.
Second half
Undead attack fought in the middle, ball carrier hanging back waiting for a good moment (to hand-off I suspect). Mid-half the Undead got bunched on a sideline taking a surf opportunity. Wizard summoned a fireball which took down a few players and the orcs sacked the ball carrier. Matlock taking up the ball and dodging away for a second score 2-0
postscript: reading the deeply unpleasant one-eyed report opposite is yet another demonstration of how that coach thinks and communicates. At time of writing his arrogance and bitterness shine through clearly - edits notwithstanding.
”