Jan-Erik
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
|
 Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 11:14 |
 
|
Make the matchmaking based on games played instead of team value, the current system only gives advantage to TV minmaxers and preys on rookie teams. I can't even remember the last time I played an actual rookie vs rookie matchup in the box, you'll always get matched into teams with mng players and 5+ skill making it a complete curbstomp against the rookie teams.
It would also solve the issue of teams with hundreds of matches played sitting in their favored TV spot beating on much less skilled teams, let's see your legendary ballcarrier and three guards face off against full stack of clawmb chaos. |
|
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 11:30 |
|
Do agree here 100%.
Make teams with over 15 games play only themselves and if I recall right old box had even more protection for teams with less than 3 games?
Competitive should mean competitive for all and not just for new teams. |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 11:32 |
|
| Jan-Erik wrote: |
let's see your legendary ballcarrier and three guards face off against full stack of clawmb chaos. |
Seems to be the match I played yesterday:
https://fumbbl.com/p/match?id=4469345
The Legendary ball carrier scored a 1TTD.
I'm favourable to extra pairing protection, I don't like TV gaps.
I'd like a max TV gap of 149 TV. That way I wouldn't have to face underpriced Wizards.
I don't think it will happen, so we have to patiently wait for the Season Re-Draft. |
|
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 11:55 |
|
"Cool story bro" |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 12:33 |
|
|
C0ddlefish
Joined: Sep 17, 2019
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 12:36 |
|
Wonder if the BBT tournament reflects this?
There are more rookie teams around in the early part of the 120 days, so you get easier draws?
Do we see more high point runs early? OR is that the case anyway because most people will pick their best 4 early anyway |
|
|
MerryZ
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 15:31 |
|
I have many times said that easy (I presume its not hard to implement ?) solution to do before redraft comes, would be to pair teams with over 15 games with eachother.
Win/win for all. You could still play old farmed teams, just wouldnt ruin other players fun.
Its not fun neither competitive to get big difference in games played. |
_________________
Kaptain Awasoam, Dicer of All Men and Women and Children and Puppies. |
|
RDaneel
Joined: Feb 24, 2023
|
| Posted:
Jul 01, 2023 - 17:20 |
|
I think redraft will mitigate a lot this "problem". As far as I'm concerned until it's not there I avoid activating teams with more than 15 games in Box because as I said once before at equal TV if you play against a team with 300 games (which presumably will have among its ranks 1 or 2 minmax statfreak) winning is very difficult unless the dice tells you right. After 15 games I try to play these teams mainly in Tournaments (there are lots of them on Fumbbl for all tastes: PARTICIPATE IN THE TOURNAMENTS folks! Minor, Major... low TV , high TV... the ones you want. i recommend it!)
By the way, I don't even know if this 15-game TV limit thing still applies because the only link to the scheduler information I could find is this https://fumbbl.com/p/notes?op=view&id=522 which--I'm told--is outdated.
I think it would be useful to know how the scheduler algorithm works today (at least I'm curious about it) |
|
|
|
|
NBFL Season 31: Its ...
Search
