Posted by Nelphine on 2020-04-05 19:12:32
I don't get why the first 2 rookie linelves are worth 49 points each.
Posted by ArrestedDevelopment on 2020-04-05 19:21:38
concession win, win, retired team. Applying it per player seems a bit off though.
Posted by Nelphine on 2020-04-05 19:42:09
and, why are the concession/win/retired points linked to the cas in the first place? if you force someone to concede with flings, isn't that worth points even if you didn't kill any of their players?
Posted by DrClaes on 2020-04-05 19:53:00
The game is primarily about causing mayhem with stunties, winning games is just the crimson icing on the cake. I've heard of stunty teams that actually play the game well and win the games [i]without[/i] (shudders) excessive violence.
Also: have considered whether to apply the bonus for wins etc only once per game rather than per kill. It will not make a huge difference since it's not a common thing to kill more than one player per game, and it's somewhat in the spirit of the game to reward multiple kills.
Posted by Bluegill87 on 2020-04-05 20:18:58
Well not to be that guy (since I'm a part of the hunt for the Throne and loving it btw) but I agree with AD and Nelphine since concessions as well as retirements can happen for any number of reasons really.
I can attest that the coach in question concedes frequently when things don't go his way and retires teams even after their first game. The hunt for the Throne could make a killing for any one coach on him alone.
Not trying to bad mouth anyone here, I just call em like I see em. I know how much FUMBBL loves the guy but I've also picked up on a lot of his habits.