Well, seems like the term pixelhugging har changed places with the term Cherrypicking.

Now people argue, if you dont want to play my lets-kill-as-many-as-possible team with your lets-just-have-some-fun-without-to-much-violence team, then you're a pixelhugger...

Well i see it like this:

I invest my time in playing. I could have taken on a second job to earn some money instead, i could have choosen to go for a walk (yes that strange thing where you use one foot to put in front of the other out in the open in the sun), or i could have done a third of fourth thing.
Doesnt really matter... Time in its very essence is limited for everyone.

If i have to spend a lot of time playing bloodbowl i want to do it with equal teams. This doesnt mean that i wont play against a team that has better bashing power or the other way around... This just means i wont play a team dedicated to trashing my team, not that i mind losing players, but i dont see the fun in ending game watching opponent jump on my players and at best having one or two players to move myself.
Does this mean that i shouldnt play bloodbowl - NO, does it mean i will decline if i dont find it to be a game that would bring me fun - YES. (I expect my opponent to do the same)

So is it wrong to make a lets-waste-the-opponent team... NOOOO ofcourse not, but just dont expect that everyone will be delighted and accept challenges just becourse you have the same TR/TS.

On that matter (TR/TS), having the same TR/TS doesnt mean that it will be a fair game... Consider a team full of dodge against a team full of tackles... Or a team full of tackle that meets team without any dodgers... It fills up TR/TS, but doesnt do any good... And ofcourse there are many more of such examples.

Well, now all challenge in good spirit and accept no and no thx. No isnt rude, just shorter...