Conference Rankings |
---|
Conf | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
- | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]FBC | 6.25 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4.12 | 3.12 | 2.12 | 2.25 | 4.1 | FBC Wins again |
[tr]SCC | 5 | 4.25 | 3.87 | 3.25 | 3.25 | 2.62 | 2.25 | 2.12 | 3.32 | SCC can't win when they stack the deck |
[tr]BBC | 4.37 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2.25 | 2.5 | 2.25 | 3.14 | BBC respectiable showing |
[tr]AKC | 2.5 | 3.37 | 1.37 | 4.37 | 4.37 | 2.5 | 2.12 | 2 | 2.82 | AKC needs to work on some things |
[tr]SMACK | 4.62 | 3 | 3.25 | 1.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.03 | Come on SMACk..talk some SMACK!!! |
[tr]TOP 10 TEAMS |
---|
Team | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
- | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]Karak | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
[tr]Miami | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 7.5 | |
[tr]Hawaii | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | |
[tr]Ottawa | 10 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 6.75 | |
[tr]TCU | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6.75 | |
[tr]Army | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 5.87 | |
[tr]Howlson | 10 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5.75 | |
[tr]PoliP | 7 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5.12 | |
[tr]UTEP | 6 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4.37 | |
[tr]Charlotte | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.75 | |
[tr]Conf or | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
Team | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]BBC | 4.37 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2.25 | 2.5 | 2.25 | 3.14 |
[tr]Ottawa | 10 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 6.75 | Lots of Information provided, but it's not as 'pretty' as some...seems more like a business report than something to promote the team |
[tr]PoliP | 7 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5.12 | Team page Layout good (colors are hard on the eyes though), but could use more info and fluff. Player bios have the info, but no layout and little fluff. No game comments |
[tr]UTEP | 6 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4.37 | Decent Info, very good layout, but other than background, not much fluff. player bio's lacking fluff and layout. only a few game comments |
[tr]Wisc | 3 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.12 | Main page lots of fluff, but layout and info lacking. no player bio over minimum, rarely comments on games |
[tr]Cal | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Though the Blue/yellow scheme is hard on my eyes, it is well laid out, not much fluff though. Player Bios minimal, and no game comments |
[tr]Hilbillies | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.62 | only minimal info or fluff. I found 1 game commented by the Hilbillies and it had little to no fluff |
[tr]Berea | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 | not much other than a quote on the main team page.. |
[tr]Fay | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Nothing but the minimum info, no fluff, no game comments |
[tr]Conf or | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
Team | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]FBC | 6.25 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4.12 | 3.12 | 2.12 | 2.25 | 4.1 |
[tr]Miami | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 7.5 | Good Home layout--but problems with spacing Info and fluff good but could use more. Player bios layout is admirable..but coding needs work. Comments almost every game. |
[tr]Army | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 5.87 | Great fluff on Main team page, but it's just a text dump, no layout and little info. Player bios great lots of info and fluff. no game comments |
[tr]Wash | 8 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | good start on INfo and fluff for main page, no layout yet. Good info on players, layout minimal, no fluff. no game comments |
[tr]Fla ST | 10 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.62 | Home page good, but little fluff, Player Bios and game comment virtually non-existant |
[tr]UM Go | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3.62 | Main page has a bit of all, but feels like it needs more, Player bios lacking in format or info, but slightly fluffy. no Game Comments |
[tr]Duke | 7 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | No fluff Main page, but info and layout ok. Minimal player bios, rarely comments on games |
[tr]Air Force | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.75 | Some info and fluff on main page, no layout to speak of. Good Player bios/layout..no fluff. no comments |
[tr]U Pike | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | No info on main page. Player fluff good, info slightly more than minimum, layout non-existant. no game comments |
[tr]Conf or | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
Team | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]SCC | 5 | 4.25 | 3.87 | 3.25 | 3.25 | 2.62 | 2.25 | 2.12 | 3.32 |
[tr]Karak | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | Yeah, I make the rankings..but then I comment every game, have some fluff in player bios, and I like my format (it's what I judge you against!) |
[tr]TCU | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6.75 | Good main page, needs a little consolidating. Great info and Layout on Player bios, little fluff, no game comments |
[tr]Florida | 10 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.62 | Lots of info on main page, layout good, but could use work, little fluff. Player bios at minimum, rarely comments |
[tr]Illy Val | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.62 | Little info, basic layout, no fluff on main page, no player bio or game comments |
[tr]Navy | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.37 | Home page needs work, just some quote. no Player bio info or game comments |
[tr]Bama | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.25 | barely above minimums |
[tr]Ball St | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | doesn't even have a logo.. |
[tr]CSUN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | doesn't even have a logo.. |
[tr]Conf or | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
Team | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]AKC | 2.5 | 3.37 | 1.37 | 4.37 | 4.37 | 2.5 | 2.12 | 2 | 2.82 |
[tr]Hawaii | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | Main page needs work, little info or fluff. Player bio's great. Comments every game, but some not so fluffy :) |
[tr]Charlotte | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.75 | Home page has little info or fluff. Great player bios' and info..no fluff. no game comments |
[tr]Howlson | 10 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5.75 | Nice Home layout, little fluff, same for the Player bios. No game comments |
[tr]N Virg | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | At least we have a logo..nothing else though |
[tr]BYU | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.37 | Logo and minimal fluff/info on main page, nothing else |
[tr]USC | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 | At least we have a logo..nothing else though |
[tr]Mz State | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 | Got a logo and a little fluff on players, nothing else |
[tr]Galld | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | doesn't even have a logo.. |
[tr]Conf or | || Home Page | ||Player Bio | ||Game Comments | Average | notes |
---|
Team | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Info | Layout | Fluff | ||Freq | Fluff | - | - |
---|
[tr]SMACK | 4.62 | 3 | 3.25 | 1.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.03 |
[tr]UCSD | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.12 | Info ok, but no fluff or layout on main page. Info for player bios, but not much else |
[tr]SMU | 7 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.62 | At least we have a logo..nothing else though |
[tr]St. L | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.25 | Good info and fluff on main page, layout lacking. Minimum player info, no comments in games |
[tr]UDUB | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.75 | Good info on main page, everything else minimum. no comments |
[tr]Oregon | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | Season 5 info on main page..a bit behind. nothing else |
[tr]UW WW | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | Slightly more info than nothing... |
[tr]Indiana | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.25 | a Little more than a logo, but not much |
[tr]Brohio | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.25 | We know they were a rookie team in Season 25..not much else. |
|