Posted by Overhamsteren on 2013-07-14 03:16:53

Welcome message in the link - classy! :D

Good thing for you is you will be matched by TV and not TW :P

Good luck with it all!

Posted by C3I2 on 2013-07-14 04:10:36

Basically, not fire for injury then?

Posted by blader4411 on 2013-07-14 04:18:31

No replacing death as well. We should start a betting pool for how many JM he ends the run with. I predict 3 players left and 8 JM :P

Posted by Cavetroll on 2013-07-14 04:47:02

You are mad! Good luck in reaching the 25 with at least 50% non-journeyman.

Posted by WoodPusher on 2013-07-14 04:54:30

I can't imagine you getting in trouble for breaking any rules. You're not trying to expose any flaw in [B] or CRP, and if you end up with to many J-men it will probably be more detrimental then helpful.

Posted by licker on 2013-07-14 05:15:00

Yeah, hopefully you have the plan in your bio, but it probably wouldn't hurt to ask an admin the next time you see one about your goal here.

I figure they might make an exception for this experiment :)

Posted by Rabe on 2013-07-14 10:20:35

I may fire injured player, since above TV 1500k or so the box is a much more dangerous place (or so I've heard). Since I can't replace them, this will only happen rarely though. Rather put them on the LOS to die or use them for stuff they're still capable off. :-)

Using Journeymen for more than a few games while being able to replace them (not the project in general) would be a breach of the site rules. Hence the disclaimer. I don't plan to let that happen. I don't ask for any special treatment or permission. If it fails, it fails.

Thanks for wishing me good luck, I'll need a portion of it. :-)

Posted by Rabe on 2013-07-14 11:15:49

@Overhamsteren:
Actually that wasn't the full message, it just hat been cut at the first spaces. ;-) Corrected that now. :-D

Posted by zakatan on 2013-07-14 18:03:40

anyway, playing with loners doesn't really change anything if you don't have any RR either...

Posted by Rabe on 2013-07-14 19:39:09

I might start buying RRs soon enough. Winning without RRs was much easier on rookie-ish TV - playing without them doesn't make any sense this high.

Posted by keggiemckill on 2013-07-14 21:14:44

No RRs is lame. inmahopinion

Posted by pythrr on 2013-07-14 21:17:44

agreed. exploit lame

Posted by Rabe on 2013-07-15 00:23:36

Just in case: The zero RR thing is necessary for the badge "Right the First Time" (win 5 consecutive games without RR).

Posted by fangbanger on 2013-07-15 17:34:02

if you can get by without buying another player for 25 games i'd be amazed!
actually I figure in 25 games you'll have about 7 J-men and 4 provisional.....if your lucky

Posted by Rabe on 2013-07-15 18:12:17

One game done already - without further injuries, but with even more +ST (now on a blitzer). :-D

Posted by garyt1 on 2013-07-15 21:10:45

Overpowered team Rabe! Especially the stat freak shadower.

Posted by C3I2 on 2013-07-16 20:31:15

There is a badge for lots of Shadowers I think, but why go for that when you can go for WWF!

Posted by Rabe on 2013-07-17 10:16:53

I go for all of them. I just acquired WWE (5 wrestlers), the shadowing badge is further away again after the retirement of one of my original blitzers a couple of games ago. :-/

Check my team bio if you want to know which badges I'm actively working on. Press the little star in the upper right corner of the boxes to switch through the "pages".